<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Disclosure Issues Mean for PR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/</link>
	<description>Resources on how to become and remain a successful freelance PR consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellye Crane</title>
		<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellye Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloprpro.com/?p=519#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another important addition to this discussion, Ben. 

For readers interested in additional background on Google&#039;s stance, Ben&#039;s post on the topic is a great overview: http://bit.ly/Zw97w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another important addition to this discussion, Ben. </p>
<p>For readers interested in additional background on Google&#8217;s stance, Ben&#8217;s post on the topic is a great overview: <a href="http://bit.ly/Zw97w"  rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Zw97w</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kunz</title>
		<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloprpro.com/?p=519#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kellye.

One more point: It&#039;s worth noting Google has weighed in against paid posts, too. Google requires bloggers who accept compensation for writing on a topic to include a no-follow tag -- which means the post is never picked up by search engines. Bloggers who do not comply risk having Google remove their page rank. (So much for blogging fame...)

For marketers and PR professionals, this means that trying to game social media with paid posts really won&#039;t work -- because Google is not going to allow such paid comments to be used to improve a brand&#039;s ranking online. For bloggers, this means you&#039;re taking a risk that the world&#039;s biggest search engine may make you invisible.

Apparently Google thinks this is more than an ethical issue. Google is worried that paid posts will pollute its ability to offer relevant search results, so it is coming down hard telling bloggers who do so to get off the Google map.

Great debate, as always! Cheers...

Ben

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ben Kunz’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thoughtgadgets.com/2009/06/why-well-miss-dos-equis-dos-demos.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why we&#039;ll miss Dos Equis&#039; dos demos&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kellye.</p>
<p>One more point: It&#8217;s worth noting Google has weighed in against paid posts, too. Google requires bloggers who accept compensation for writing on a topic to include a no-follow tag &#8212; which means the post is never picked up by search engines. Bloggers who do not comply risk having Google remove their page rank. (So much for blogging fame&#8230;)</p>
<p>For marketers and PR professionals, this means that trying to game social media with paid posts really won&#8217;t work &#8212; because Google is not going to allow such paid comments to be used to improve a brand&#8217;s ranking online. For bloggers, this means you&#8217;re taking a risk that the world&#8217;s biggest search engine may make you invisible.</p>
<p>Apparently Google thinks this is more than an ethical issue. Google is worried that paid posts will pollute its ability to offer relevant search results, so it is coming down hard telling bloggers who do so to get off the Google map.</p>
<p>Great debate, as always! Cheers&#8230;</p>
<p>Ben</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ben Kunz’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.thoughtgadgets.com/2009/06/why-well-miss-dos-equis-dos-demos.html"  rel="nofollow">Why we&#8217;ll miss Dos Equis&#8217; dos demos</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellye Crane</title>
		<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellye Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloprpro.com/?p=519#comment-482</guid>
		<description>@Ben- Thanks for weighing in with such a well-articulated (and colorful!) explanation of your stance on the ethics of blogging.  

PR and marketing pros will encounter bloggers of various ethical stripes. Yours is a great reminder that some bloggers still adhere to a journalistic standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben- Thanks for weighing in with such a well-articulated (and colorful!) explanation of your stance on the ethics of blogging.  </p>
<p>PR and marketing pros will encounter bloggers of various ethical stripes. Yours is a great reminder that some bloggers still adhere to a journalistic standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Kunz</title>
		<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloprpro.com/?p=519#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Nice post. However, I think the focus on disclosure really misses the point. Disclosing something does not make it right. Disclosing is not the answer, because it does not solve the ethics.

If prostitutes *disclose* they take payment from a client, does that make it OK? If you *disclose* to your spouse you slept with another person for a gift, is that cool? How is your reputation afterward? Bloggers who accept compensation for writing reviews risk permanently damaging their voices -- because trust me, taking a gift card to write a review means you are shilling. 

If you doubt this, why not go all the way and drop brand names into your oral conversations, too? Just think how delighted your friends will be to hear you over barbecue segue into a Kmart riff. But that&#039;s OK. Just disclose you got a gift card.

Now, let&#039;s turn it around. Imagine what happens if you DON&#039;T shill. One of the big breaks in my career came when an editor from BusinessWeek called and asked me to write a column, based on the authenticity he saw in my blog. I don&#039;t have the best blog in the world, but I don&#039;t write about clients, I don&#039;t take payment -- instead, I offer my real, real view. Somehow he stumbled upon it, and decided I was a person he could trust. (Thank you, Tom...)

It&#039;s all a choice. You really need to think hard, though, before you sell out your voice. You only have one. If you are authentic, people will notice you, and it will lead you places. Be careful, because your voice is worth far more than you think.

Ben Kunz
c 203 506 7269

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ben Kunz’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thoughtgadgets.com/2009/06/why-well-miss-dos-equis-dos-demos.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why we&#039;ll miss Dos Equis&#039; dos demos&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. However, I think the focus on disclosure really misses the point. Disclosing something does not make it right. Disclosing is not the answer, because it does not solve the ethics.</p>
<p>If prostitutes *disclose* they take payment from a client, does that make it OK? If you *disclose* to your spouse you slept with another person for a gift, is that cool? How is your reputation afterward? Bloggers who accept compensation for writing reviews risk permanently damaging their voices &#8212; because trust me, taking a gift card to write a review means you are shilling. </p>
<p>If you doubt this, why not go all the way and drop brand names into your oral conversations, too? Just think how delighted your friends will be to hear you over barbecue segue into a Kmart riff. But that&#8217;s OK. Just disclose you got a gift card.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s turn it around. Imagine what happens if you DON&#8217;T shill. One of the big breaks in my career came when an editor from BusinessWeek called and asked me to write a column, based on the authenticity he saw in my blog. I don&#8217;t have the best blog in the world, but I don&#8217;t write about clients, I don&#8217;t take payment &#8212; instead, I offer my real, real view. Somehow he stumbled upon it, and decided I was a person he could trust. (Thank you, Tom&#8230;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a choice. You really need to think hard, though, before you sell out your voice. You only have one. If you are authentic, people will notice you, and it will lead you places. Be careful, because your voice is worth far more than you think.</p>
<p>Ben Kunz<br />
c 203 506 7269</p>
<p><abbr><em>Ben Kunz’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.thoughtgadgets.com/2009/06/why-well-miss-dos-equis-dos-demos.html"  rel="nofollow">Why we&#8217;ll miss Dos Equis&#8217; dos demos</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellye Crane</title>
		<link>http://soloprpro.com/what-disclosure-issues-mean-for-pr/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellye Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloprpro.com/?p=519#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Beth. Affiliate links work best when the blogger is a genuine fan of the &quot;product&quot; (in your case, a conference) -- I know Brian Clark of Copyblogger is a proponent and very successful example of this. 

Affiliations only become an issue when readers can sense the writer is selling something to them just to make a buck. Being open and true to yourself, as you were, is always the best policy. Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Beth. Affiliate links work best when the blogger is a genuine fan of the &#8220;product&#8221; (in your case, a conference) &#8212; I know Brian Clark of Copyblogger is a proponent and very successful example of this. </p>
<p>Affiliations only become an issue when readers can sense the writer is selling something to them just to make a buck. Being open and true to yourself, as you were, is always the best policy. Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
